12 Points

9 Points

6 Points

Comments

Content (9)

Excellent at covering concepts in the tutorial as identified by the introduction.

Adequately covers topic as identified by introduction.

Poorly covers topic and/or does not introduce topic to audience.

 Covers a couple of good ideas.

Organization (9)

Content is well organized and progresses through the tutorial logically in a manner that is clear to viewer.

Content is mostly organized and makes some sense to the viewer.

Content is poorly organized and difficult for the viewer to follow.

A bit too conversational. You don't know what you're really going to learn before she jumps into the ideas.

Design** (6)

Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation; is consistent in font size, color, style; tutorial is easy to read.

Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation but some inconsistencies in size, color, style may appear.

Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.

The background was a bit too distracting because it is as colorful as what you are supposed to be focused on. 

Visuals (12)

Excellent image quality with much variety that relates strongly to the content. Creativity used in choice of images.

Good image quality that mostly relates to the topic. Some evidence of creativity.

Poor image quality or does not have adequate images in the tutorial. Many images that do not relate to the content of the tutorial.

Visuals were good examples.

Interactivity (6)

Several examples of interactivity used within the presentation to engage the viewer in content.

At least one example of interactivity that attempts to engage the viewer in the presentation.

No interactivity component in the presentation.

 No interactivity.

Narration (9)

Narration is upbeat and friendly; shows strong evidence of narrator's interest in topic.

Recorded narration is mostly upbeat and shows enthusiasm at times.

Recorded narration is monotone with no voice expression or interest in topic.

The vocal editing is jumpy and the voice is sometimes hard to hear because the music is too loud.

Grammar** (9)

No misspellings or grammatical errors. No HTML errors in tutorial (e.g., broken links, missing images).

Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. No more than two HTML errors in tutorial

Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors. Multiple errors in HTML.

There are some problems with the grammar.

Audience (12)

Tutorial is clearly directed toward undergraduate college audience who are English language learners.

Most of tutorial directed toward undergraduate audience.

Tutorial is inappropriate for intended audience.

 The tutorial was appropriate to the audience.

Creativity (9)

Topic covered with unusual insight and creativity. Information presented in unusual or unique way.

Topic covered with some insight and creativity with some original ideas way.

Topic mainly presents others' ideas with little creativity apparent.

It was unclear which ideas were hers and which were gleaned from research.

Credits (9)

Full credits included with citation for any content included; all credits clearly indicated at the end of the presentation. Name of tutorial developer included in presentation.

Credits are not included in the presentation.

The only things credited were the two research papers. 

Humor/Fun

Evidence of humor in your presentation - fun factor is included.

I didn't notice any humor. 

90/120

** Partial rubric criteria from NCTE/IRA retrieved January 2007 from http://www.readwritethink.org/lesson_images/lesson979/wikirubric.pdf

Your tutorial should address the items listed below in the rubric. When you are providing feedback to another student, this rubric should be your guide. Please provide your teammate comments that will be helpful to them in improving their product.

12 Points

9 Points

6 Points

Comments

Content (6)

Excellent at covering concepts in the tutorial as identified by the introduction.

Adequately covers topic as identified by introduction.

Poorly covers topic and/or does not introduce topic to audience.

 Script covers the topic. Not sure about introduction.

Organization (6)

Content is well organized and progresses through the tutorial logically in a manner that is clear to viewer.

Content is mostly organized and makes some sense to the viewer.

Content is poorly organized and difficult for the viewer to follow.

 The content is not organized because there are no markers as to which part of the script you should read with which slide.

Design** (9)

Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation; is consistent in font size, color, style; tutorial is easy to read.

Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation but some inconsistencies in size, color, style may appear.

Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.

 The power point is fine. The pictures don't flow as nicely.

Visuals (6)

Excellent image quality with much variety that relates strongly to the content. Creativity used in choice of images.

Good image quality that mostly relates to the topic. Some evidence of creativity.

Poor image quality or does not have adequate images in the tutorial. Many images that do not relate to the content of the tutorial.

Some images are clear while others have strange hues to them. 

Interactivity (6)

Several examples of interactivity used within the presentation to engage the viewer in content.

At least one example of interactivity that attempts to engage the viewer in the presentation.

No interactivity component in the presentation.

 No interactivity.

Narration (0)

Narration is upbeat and friendly; shows strong evidence of narrator's interest in topic.

Recorded narration is mostly upbeat and shows enthusiasm at times.

Recorded narration is monotone with no voice expression or interest in topic.

 There is no recorded narration.

Grammar** (12)

No misspellings or grammatical errors. No HTML errors in tutorial (e.g., broken links, missing images).

Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. No more than two HTML errors in tutorial

Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors. Multiple errors in HTML.

 Grammar was fine.

Audience (12)

Tutorial is clearly directed toward undergraduate college audience who are English language learners.

Most of tutorial directed toward undergraduate audience.

Tutorial is inappropriate for intended audience.

 The tutorial was appropriate to the audience.

Creativity (9)

Topic covered with unusual insight and creativity. Information presented in unusual or unique way.

Topic covered with some insight and creativity with some original ideas way.

Topic mainly presents others' ideas with little creativity apparent.

It is unclear whether the ideas were from the research or the author. 

Credits (9)

Full credits included with citation for any content included; all credits clearly indicated at the end of the presentation. Name of tutorial developer included in presentation.

Credits are not included in the presentation.

 Credits were not all there, or in proper format.

Humor/Fun (0)

Evidence of humor in your presentation - fun factor is included.

 I didn't find any evidence of humor.

75/120

** Partial rubric criteria from NCTE/IRA retrieved January 2007 from http://www.readwritethink.org/lesson_images/lesson979/wikirubric.pdf