12 Points

9 Points

6 Points

Comments

Review of:

Jennifer E.

Scroll down for review of Patricia P.

Content (9)

Excellent at covering concepts in the tutorial as identified by the introduction.

Adequately covers topic as identified by introduction.

Poorly covers topic and/or does not introduce topic to audience.

This adequately covers topic and even covers other things outside of area of concern for uses of Twitter.

Organization (9)

Content is well organized and progresses through the tutorial logically in a manner that is clear to viewer.

Content is mostly organized and makes some sense to the viewer.

Content is poorly organized and difficult for the viewer to follow.

The organization is good.  It starts with explaining Twitter a little and then talks about ideas that teachers can use to Twitter.

Design** (6)

Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation; is consistent in font size, color, style; tutorial is easy to read.

Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation but some inconsistencies in size, color, style may appear.

Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.

Visuals (12)

Excellent image quality with much variety that relates strongly to the content. Creativity used in choice of images.

Good image quality that mostly relates to the topic. Some evidence of creativity.

Poor image quality or does not have adequate images in the tutorial. Many images that do not relate to the content of the tutorial.

Lots of visual examples for the audience.

Interactivity (6)

Several examples of interactivity used within the presentation to engage the viewer in content.

At least one example of interactivity that attempts to engage the viewer in the presentation.

No interactivity component in the presentation.

There was no interactive component.  There was explanation of interactive activities in the presentation.

Narration (9)

Narration is upbeat and friendly; shows strong evidence of narrator's interest in topic.

Recorded narration is mostly upbeat and shows enthusiasm at times.

Recorded narration is monotone with no voice expression or interest in topic.

Narration was fine for the environment and the music did not overpower the speaker.

Grammar** (9)

No misspellings or grammatical errors. No HTML errors in tutorial (e.g., broken links, missing images).

Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. No more than two HTML errors in tutorial

Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors. Multiple errors in HTML.

Twitter is restricted to 140 characters so Twitting can be less than an English teachers favorite thing.

Audience (12)

Tutorial is clearly directed toward undergraduate college audience who are English language learners.

Most of tutorial directed toward undergraduate audience.

Tutorial is inappropriate for intended audience.

The audience should feel like the presenter was talking at their level.

Creativity (9)

Topic covered with unusual insight and creativity. Information presented in unusual or unique way.

Topic covered with some insight and creativity with some original ideas way.

Topic mainly presents others' ideas with little creativity apparent.

Creativity was included. The background music was soothing, the presentation was nice and the overall project was creative.

Credits (9)

Full credits included with citation for any content included; all credits clearly indicated at the end of the presentation. Name of tutorial developer included in presentation.

Credits are not included in the presentation.

There were two research papers credited. 

Humor/Fun

Evidence of humor in your presentation - fun factor is included.

No humor in the presentation.

/120

** Partial rubric criteria from NCTE/IRA retrieved January 2007 from http://www.readwritethink.org/lesson_images/lesson979/wikirubric.pdf

Your tutorial should address the items listed below in the rubric. When you are providing feedback to another student, this rubric should be your guide. Please provide your teammate comments that will be helpful to them in improving their product.

12 Points

9 Points

6 Points

Comments

Review of:

Patrica P.

Content (6)

Excellent at covering concepts in the tutorial as identified by the introduction.

Adequately covers topic as identified by introduction.

Poorly covers topic and/or does not introduce topic to audience.

Content is spelled out up front in a Table of Contents type of setup.

Organization (6)

Content is well organized and progresses through the tutorial logically in a manner that is clear to viewer.

Content is mostly organized and makes some sense to the viewer.

Content is poorly organized and difficult for the viewer to follow.

Good organization.  Talks about what uses of Twitter and who can have Twitter. 

Design** (9)

Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation; is consistent in font size, color, style; tutorial is easy to read.

Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation but some inconsistencies in size, color, style may appear.

Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.

Design is easy to read and only slightly blurry, but not where it would cause difficulty in reading. 

Visuals (6)

Excellent image quality with much variety that relates strongly to the content. Creativity used in choice of images.

Good image quality that mostly relates to the topic. Some evidence of creativity.

Poor image quality or does not have adequate images in the tutorial. Many images that do not relate to the content of the tutorial.

Nice pictures and comic strips.  Links in the presentation were hard to see b/c of the color.  Web pages were hard to read.

Interactivity (6)

Several examples of interactivity used within the presentation to engage the viewer in content.

At least one example of interactivity that attempts to engage the viewer in the presentation.

No interactivity component in the presentation.

There was no interactivity in the presentation. 

Narration (0)

Narration is upbeat and friendly; shows strong evidence of narrator's interest in topic.

Recorded narration is mostly upbeat and shows enthusiasm at times.

Recorded narration is monotone with no voice expression or interest in topic.

Narration was clear and rehearsed. 

Grammar** (12)

No misspellings or grammatical errors. No HTML errors in tutorial (e.g., broken links, missing images).

Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. No more than two HTML errors in tutorial

Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors. Multiple errors in HTML.

Seemed to be okay.

Audience (12)

Tutorial is clearly directed toward undergraduate college audience who are English language learners.

Most of tutorial directed toward undergraduate audience.

Tutorial is inappropriate for intended audience.

Touched on Twitting to your audience and the presentation was aimed at the correct audience. 

Creativity (9)

Topic covered with unusual insight and creativity. Information presented in unusual or unique way.

Topic covered with some insight and creativity with some original ideas way.

Topic mainly presents others' ideas with little creativity apparent.

Presentation contained user specific ideas and items.

Credits (9)

Full credits included with citation for any content included; all credits clearly indicated at the end of the presentation. Name of tutorial developer included in presentation.

Credits are not included in the presentation.

Credits were included. 

Humor/Fun (0)

Evidence of humor in your presentation - fun factor is included.

Comical tones were present in the presenters voice.

/120

** Partial rubric criteria from NCTE/IRA retrieved January 2007 from http://www.readwritethink.org/lesson_images/lesson979/wikirubric.pdf